Tutorials
Renewal risk on sample data
The canonical scenario, end to end, with known-right answers.
Scenario
You are the operations lead at a fictional company with 120 accounts in a sample CRM. Leadership asks: which of our top 20 accounts are at renewal risk next quarter, and why? Everything here runs on the provided sample dataset — nothing of yours is touched.
Image: the sample dataset overview: accounts, orders, interactions.
Definition of done
- One forecast ranking the top 20 accounts by renewal risk.
- Every ranked account traceable to evidence you can read.
- One recorded correction that visibly improves the rerun.
Steps
- Connect the sample source. Install it from the catalog like any source, but note the difference: sample data is fixed and documented, so surprises are lessons, not incidents.
- Describe the decision. "Rank our top 20 accounts by renewal risk next quarter, with reasons." Read the proposal as a scope check: target, time range, audience.
Image: proposal with target, time range, and audience highlighted as the three scope answers.
- Shape the slice. Define the account and order entity types, the places-relationship, and the identifiers — then map, resolve identity, and materialize. Two accounts in the sample are near-duplicates on purpose; catch them here.
Image: the duplicate pair and the identity rule that merges them.
- Dry-run skeptically. Check the drivers against the sample notes: support tickets and late orders should dominate, exactly as the data was built to show.
- Commit and defend. Pick the riskiest account and walk its evidence chain end to end, then record one correction the preview missed.
Image: evidence chain expanded from the riskiest account down to tickets, orders, and the runs that built each link.
- Rerun and compare. Confirm the correction moved the result. That visible change is the loop working — the skill every tutorial teaches.
Image: before/after ranking with the corrected account moved and the reason attached.
What good looks like
- You predicted the known-risk accounts the sample was built around.
- You can explain any ranking from evidence alone.
- The rerun visibly accounts for your correction.
Next
- Do it with your data: Getting started.
- Definitions behind every step: Reference.
- Day-to-day depth: Operators.